| 000 | 01168cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63019 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108958 | ||
| 100 | _aGould, L. | ||
| 245 | _aKey maintenance ruling | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aFacilities Management _v8(1) October 2000, 23(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe case of "Nottingham Community Housing Association v Powerminster Ltd" has alerted facilities managers to the liberal interpreation given to the meaning of a construction contract in the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. In his conclusion the Judge stated: 'The work of altering or dismantling heating and other systems that have been installed in a building is every bit as much a 'construction' activity as the work of altering the walls or roof of a building'. Considers the implications of this ruling for facilities management contracts. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMAINTENANCE CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aNOTTINGHAM COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIATION V POWERMINSTER LTD | ||
| 690 | _aMANAGEMENT-FACILITIES MANAGEMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65066 _d65066 |
||