| 000 | 01387cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3642-26 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u108962 | ||
| 245 | _aTown and country planning | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2000] EGCS 111 (21/10/00) |
||
| 520 | _a"Retail Media Ltd v SOS Environment" QBD 11 October 2000. The claimant was refused advertising consent for a poster panel near similar advertisements on a bus shelter. The claimant appealed using Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992 regulation 4(1). The advertisement control officer concluded that 'displays on bus shelters are not directly comparable in amenity terms' and dismissed the appeal because of the adverse affect of the proposed advertisment. The claimant challenged the inspector on the grounds that he failed to give adequate reasons for his conclusion on the point of consistency. "Held", claim allowed. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aRETAIL MEDIA LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT | ||
| 650 | _aMACCLESFIELD | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS) REGULATIONS 1992 | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S288 | ||
| 650 | _aADVERTISEMENT CONTROL | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aPOSTER PANELS | ||
| 690 |
_aPlanning and development _96259 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65069 _d65069 |
||