000			01425cam a2200289 4500
001			ABS63047
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u109003
100			_aLovitt _A.
245		2	_aA closer look at Mannai
260			_c2000
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0042) 21 October 2000, 170-171(2)
520			_aThe findings in the case of "Mannai" represented a turning point in judicial attitudes to erroneous notices. Since the decision it has become clear that the Mannai principle has a wider application than was first thought. It may apply to statutory as well as contractual notices. However, discusses several decisions subsequent to "Mannai", which have established limitations on the principle. For instance, "Mannai" will only assist the server of a notice if there is an obvious error on the face of the notice, and a reasonable recipient would not have been misled by it. Concludes that there can be no substitute for clear and concise drafting.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANNAI INVESTMENT CO LTD V EAGLE STAR LIFE ASSURANCE CO LTD UK
650			_aNOTICES
650			_aSTATUTORY NOTICES
650			_aCONTRACTUAL NOTICE
650			_aBREAK CLAUSES
650			_aEXPIRY DATE
650			_aLIMITATIONS
650			_aDETERMINATION OF LEASE
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES
700			_aMartin, J.
942			_n0
999			_c65099 _d65099