000			01206cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS62953
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u109005
100			_aBingham, T.
245			_aFeeling the pinch
260			_c2000
490			_aBuilding _v265(8158) 20 October 2000, 63(1)
520			_aDiscusses the case of "George Jones v The Mayor & Burgesses of the Tower Hamlets LBC". In this an architect, Jones, believing that Tower Hamlets had copied his design and scheme for 80 new homes at Armagh Road, Bow, sued the latter for breach of copyright. He lost the case handsomely. Considers the implications of the ruling. The key implication is that you cannot copy an architect's artistic work, but he is not protected from others following ideas embodied in the work. An architect may legitimately inspect an original plan and then, having observed the architectural concept and style, apply these to his own original plan.
590			_aABS
650			_aBUILDING DESIGNS
650			_aARCHITECTS
650			_aCOPYRIGHT
650			_aJONES V TOWER HAMLETS LBC
650			_aINFRINGEMENT
690			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-CONSTRUCTION DESIGN
942			_n0
999			_c65101 _d65101