| 000 | 01280cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS62998 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109105 | ||
| 100 | _aHogarth, A. | ||
| 245 | _aNo time to be out of phase | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0043) 28 October 2000, 180-181(2) |
||
| 520 | _aDevelopers require flexibility when undertaking development projects, but they can often be caught out by time-limits. Considers "R v Leicester City Council and another ex p Powergen". The decision in this case could mean that in future developers will have to look more carefully at some of the more common conditions attached to planning permissions. For instance, in appropriate circumstances, developers may need to negotiate the terms of the actual planning permission as closely as the terms of any s106 or related agreement. Provides a concise listing of key points that developers can learn from the Powergen ruling. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S73 | ||
| 650 | _aR V LEICESTER CITY COUNCIL AND ANOTHER EX P POWERGEN UK PLC | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING CONDITIONS | ||
| 650 | _aFLEXIBILITY | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY-PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65147 _d65147 |
||