000			01267cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS63049
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u109191
245			_aGilje and others v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
260			_c2000
490			_aEstates Gazette _v[2000] 4 November 2000, 44 EG 148-153(6)
520			_aLT 15 August 2000. G were lessees of 4 flats in a building. The landlord (C), owner of the headlease, sought to recover a notional rent in respect of 1994/5 for the flat occupied by the caretaker. In respect of the years 1995-1998 C increased the caretaker's wages, in order to cover the rent of the flat. G challenged their liability to pay various items in the service charge by an application to the LVT. The LVT decided the charged sum and the increased wages were reasonable. G appealed. Held, C was not entitled to recover, by either of the methods used, a notional rent in respect of the caretaker's flat.
590			_aABS
650			_aGILJE AND OTHERS V CHARLEGROVE SECURITIES LTD
650			_aCARETAKER
650			_aSERVICE CHARGES
650			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1985 S19
650			_aNOTIONAL RENT
650			_aLEASES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c65187 _d65187