| 000 | 01275cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63010 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109242 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aDon't listen to the chickens | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8156) 6 October 2000, 85(1) |
||
| 520 | _aConsiders the implications for adjudication of the ruling in "Discain Project Services v Opecprime Development Ltd". In this, Judge Bowsher stated that adjudication could only be made to work in practice 'if some of the rules of natural justice that have no demonstrable consequence are disregarded'. Suggests "Discain" does not undermine the adjudication system, and that the reference to natural justice simply means that any judicial tribunal must be 'fair in all circumstances'. Beyond that there are no hard and fast rules. Argues the ruling does not indicate that in future adjudicators will have to meet and discuss disputes with both parties at the same time. It merely stresses the point that the adjudicator must be fair. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aDISCAIN PROJECT SERVICES LTD V OPECPRIME DEVELOPMENT LTD | ||
| 650 | _aNATURAL JUSTICE | ||
| 650 | _aFAIRNESS | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65212 _d65212 |
||