000 00740cam a2200205 4500
001 WB3644-22
008 000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u109297
245 _aDeemed insufficient
260 _c2000
490 _aEstates Gazette
_v 4 November 2000, 147(1)
520 _aReviews "Starmark Enterprises v CPL Distribution" which raises the issue of whether a deeming provision, in this instance a failure to serve a counternotice to a rent review notice, makes time of the essence.
590 _aWB
650 _aRENT REVIEWS
650 _aTIME OF THE ESSENCE
650 _aCOUNTERNOTICES
650 _aSTARMARK ENTERPRISES V CPL DISTRIBUTION
690 _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS
942 _n0
999 _c65236
_d65236