| 000 | 01181cam a2200289 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63119 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109302 | ||
| 100 | _aLindsey, S | ||
| 245 | _aExercising reasonable care is not good enough for clients | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aArchitects' Journal _v12 October 2000, 48(1) |
||
| 520 | _aSuggests that the standard performance measure of reasonable skill and care has become uncertain as construction procurement changes. The employment of consultants by clients and contractors is blurring traditional obligations, as shown by the "Greaves v Baynham Meikle" case. Concludes that increased client expectations and public demand for safety may not be compatible with the reasonable skill and care defence. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aOBLIGATIONS | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLE CARE | ||
| 650 | _aREASONABLE SKILL | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING CONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aCONSULTANTS | ||
| 650 | _aSAFETY | ||
| 650 | _aGREAVES AND CO V BAYNHAM MEIKLE AND PARTNERS | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 650 | _aCLIENT EXPECTATIONS | ||
| 690 |
_aProcurement _96260 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65238 _d65238 |
||