000			01602cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS63203
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u109435
100			_aGoodall, M
245			_aCourt issues fair play warning over posters
260			_c2000
490			_aPlanning (for the Natural and Built Environment) _v10 November 2000, 22(1)
520			_aExamines the growing frustration in the advertising industry with the Planning Inspectorate's handling of appeals relating to six-sheet advertisements. Advertising companies such as Primesight have become annoyed with the inspectorate's inability to make fair comparisons between proposals for free-standing displays and those in existence in the same area, particularly in bus shelters. Discusses how the recent case of "Retail Media Ltd v SoS Environment", established clear guidelines for how future appeals should be conducted. Concludes that if an existing display is to be disregarded under regulation 4(1)(a) of the Town and Country Planning (Control of Advertisements) Regulations 1992, this must be clearly stated, and there must be a good reason for doing so.
590			_aABS
650			_aPOSTERS
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (CONTROL OF ADVERTISEMENTS) REGULATIONS 1992
650			_aPPG19
650			_aRETAIL MEDIA LTD V SOS ENVIRONMENT
650			_aPOSTER PANELS
650			_aPLANNING APPEALS
650			_aADVERTISEMENT CONTROL
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
700			_aAuchincloss, M
700			_aPatel, N
942			_n0
999			_c65324 _d65324