| 000 | 01477cam a2200313 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63122 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109527 | ||
| 100 | _aElias, A | ||
| 245 | 4 | _aThe American way | |
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8162) 17 November 2000, 66(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the differences between US and UK construction law, and highlights the advantages and disadvantages of each system. Focuses on risk allocation for projects, payment for contractors, and how materials and equipment are dealt with. The USA provides better protection for contractors as most projects operate on a construction management basis, which means the element of risk resides with the employer. In addition, unpaid contractors and subcontractors can register statutory 'mechanics' lien' in respect to materials and equipment. However, UK contractors benefits from no enforced pay when paid clauses, despite the introduction of the Construction Act 1996. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aPAYMENT | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING MATERIALS | ||
| 650 | _aPAY WHEN PAID CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION PROCUREMENT | ||
| 650 | _aEQUIPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aMECHANICS LIEN | ||
| 650 | _aRISK | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING CONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED KINGDOM | ||
| 650 | _aUNITED STATES | ||
| 690 |
_aProcurement _96260 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65390 _d65390 |
||