000			01515cab a2200313 4500
001			WB3028-12
008			090401t xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10388
041			_aeng
245			_aValuation cannot be overturned
260			_c1994) EGCS 125 (16/7/94)
350			_a0
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v1994) EGCS 125 (16/7/94)
520			_a"Ward Construction (Medway) Ltd v Barclays Bank plc and another"; "Barclays Bank plc v Kent CC" CA 1 July 1994. Although the valuation for compensation for the compulsory purchase of land for highway improvements for a residential development was high, there was no error in law to allow interference with the decision. The Pointe Gourde principle had been correctly applied and as for the Stokes `principle`, the use of this as a principle of valuation not law, was for the LT to decide.
650			_aACCESS
650			_aBATCHELOR V KENT CC
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCompulsory purchase _96228
650			_aLANDS TRIBUNAL
650			_aNO-SCHEME WORLD
650			_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650			_aPOINTE GOURDE QUARRYING AND TRANSPORT CO LTD V CROWN LANDS SUPERINTENDENT
650			_aSTOKES V CAMBRIDGE CORPORATION
650			_aValuation _96273
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
690			_aRATING AND VALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6545 _d6545