000 00746cam a2200205 4500
001 WB3647-01
008 000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u109636
245 _aRight of way
260 _c2000
490 _aEstates Gazette Case Summaries
_v[2000] EGCS 42 (25/11/00)
520 _a"Peacock and another v Custins v another" CA 14 November 2000. The defendant' s allegation that the right of way was being exercised to accommodate a property other than the dominant tenement identified in the grant was accepted.. Appeal allowed
590 _aWB
650 _aPEACOCK V CUSTINS
650 _aRIGHT OF WAY
650 _aEASEMENT
650 _aEXPRESS GRANT
690 _aBoundary disputes
_96221
942 _n0
999 _c65454
_d65454