| 000 | 01445cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63105 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109680 | ||
| 100 | _aBlackler, T. | ||
| 245 | _aIs that your final answer? | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8163) 24 November 2000, 56-57(2) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines how far the final certificate clause in JCT contracts can prevent a client from suing a contractor for latent defects. Discusses the recent case of "Barking LBC v Terrapin Construction" where the omission of references to 'design' in the final certificate clause under the JCT 1981 contract, meant the client was not prevented from complaining about design defects after the final account and final statement. Concludes that JCT should act accordingly to avoid further confusion, by either identifying a clear cut-off point with regard to design, materials and workmanship or disregarding the notion. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aJCT 1981 | ||
| 650 | _aJCT STANDARD FORM OF BUILDING CONTRACT (1998 EDITION) | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-STANDARD FORMS OF BUILDING CONTRACT-JOINT CONTRACTS TRIBNUAL CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aDESIGN DEFECTS | ||
| 650 | _aFINAL CERTIFICATE | ||
| 650 | _aBARKING AND DAGENHAM LBC V TERRAPIN CONSTRUCTION | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CONTRACTS-JCT CONTRACTS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65478 _d65478 |
||