| 000 | 01297cam a2200265 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63246 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109687 | ||
| 100 | _aNuttall, L | ||
| 245 | _aTime to reverse charges | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0047) 25 November 2000, 169(1) |
||
| 520 | _aSuggests that the hearing of "Cantor Fitzgerald" and "Mirror Group plc" will provide the European Court of Justice (ECJ) with sufficient evidence to clarify the confusing reverse payment rules relating to property transactions. ECJ has the opportunity to decide the correct VAT position of payments made with the intention of inducing a third party to do something under a land transaction. Considers the complexity of reverse payments in the context of a grant or an assignment of lease, and looks at how "Lubbock Fine" is applicable to both "Mirror" and "Cantor". | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aEUROPEAN COURT | ||
| 650 | _aVALUE ADDED TAX | ||
| 650 | _aLUBBOCK FINE V C&EC | ||
| 650 | _aCANTOR FITZGERALD V CUSTOM AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aMIRROR GROUP PLC V CUSTOM AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aREVERSE PREMIUMS | ||
| 650 | _aLAND TRANSACTIONS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMERCIAL LEASES | ||
| 690 | _aTAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65483 _d65483 |
||