| 000 | 01542cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63088 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109716 | ||
| 245 | _aBarry v Heathcote Ball & Co (Commercial Auctions) Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2000] 47 EG 178-182(5) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 27 July 2000. The appellent (H) ran an auction business. H accepted two new machines to be sold without reserve at an auction on 25 June 1997. At the auction H gave a price of £14,000 per machine. The respondent (B) was the only bidder, and bid £200 for each machine. H did not accept the bids and withdrew the machines claiming he could get more money selling them elsewhere. B claimed damages on the grounds that he was the highest bidder, and sought the difference between his bid of £400 and the value of both machines of £28,000. Court decided a collateral contract existed between the auctioneer and the highest bidder, and withdrawing a lot would only apply if a dispute had occurred between bidders. H appealed against liability and damages assessment. "Held: appeal dismissed". The Sale of Goods Act 1979 s57 must be complied with if the auctioneer is to bid in a sale by auction without reserve. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aSALE OF GOODS ACT 1979 S57 | ||
| 650 |
_aAuctioneering _96218 |
||
| 650 | _aWITHOUT RESERVE | ||
| 650 | _aCOLLATERAL CONTRACTS | ||
| 650 | _aBARRY V HEATHCOTE BALL & CO (COMMERCIAL AUCTIONS) LTD | ||
| 690 |
_aAuctioneering _96218 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65488 _d65488 |
||