000			01226cam a2200229 4500
001			WB3648-30
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u109780
245			_aHighway dedication
260			_c2000
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v [2000] EGCS 137 (02/12/00)
520			_a"Hale v Norfolk CC" CA 17 November 2000. A owned a property with a garden fronting onto a roadway, in respect of which the council (B) were the local highway authority. A erected several low posts and a chain along the edge of the garden where it met the roadway. B objected and served a notice requiring their removal, claiming that a certain part of the land had been dedicated as part of the highway. A issued proceedings claiming a declaration that the land did not form part of the highway, and seeking an order for B to replace the posts and chain. Claim dismissed. B appealed but the appeal was dismissed. The "hedge-to-hedge" presumption applied.
590			_aWB
650			_aHALE V NORFOLK CC
650			_aHIGHWAYS ACT 1980 S143
650			_aGARDENS
650			_aHIGHWAYS
650			_aHEDGE-TO-HEDGE PRESUMPTION
650			_aPUBLIC USE
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c65521 _d65521