| 000 | 01157cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63257 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u109888 | ||
| 100 | _aWinter, J | ||
| 245 | _aCalculating the overheads when a job has hit delays | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6693) 23 November 2000, 31(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines contractors' delay claims which include a claim for 'head office overhead and profit'. Claimants often use one of three arithmetical formulae - Hudson's, Emden or Eichleay - to calculate their claims. Such a claim can only succeed if it can be proved that the contractor was deprived of the opportunity to win work. The article describes the different types of overhead that can be included and examines each of the formulae before advising that formulae must be used with caution. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACT CLAIMS | ||
| 650 | _aDELAYS | ||
| 650 | _aHUDSONS FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aEMDEN FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aEICHLEAY FORMULA | ||
| 650 | _aHEAD OFFICE OVERHEADS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 700 | _aPike, R | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65556 _d65556 |
||