000			01615cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS63290
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u110007
245			_aAdam v Woking BC
260			_c2000
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v [2000] RVR 329-334(6)
520			_aLT 7 February 2000. Claimant A sought compensation for disturbance under the Land Compensation Act 1973 S38(1), following the loss of her flat after it was declared unfit for human habitation. A turned down the rehousing options, including a first floor flat, offered by Woking BC (W) while she was waiting for legal proceedings to conclude. On her landlord successfully obtaining a possession order against A, W offered a 1st floor flat which A then declared was unsuitable as she was asthmatic and her dog was arthritic and unable to negotiate stairs. Because of problems with moving in to the flat, A was paid a home loss payment and compensation by W. However A claimed further compensation for items such a kennelling and other additional expenses but it was held that the compensation offered by W was sufficient.
590			_aABS
650			_aLAND COMPENSATION ACT 1973 S38
650			_aADAM V WOKING BC
650			_aDISTURBANCE
650			_aPROTECTED TENANCIES
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aCLOSING ORDER
650			_aREHOUSING
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT-COMPULSORY PURCHASE AND COMPENSATION
856			_uhttps://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWLands/2000/LCA_88_1999.html _zJudgment available on BAILII
942			_n0 _2ddc
999			_c65615 _d65615