| 000 | 00927cab a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3044-49 | ||
| 008 | 090401t1994 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u10412 | ||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 245 | _aRent review system in chaos | ||
| 260 | _c1994 | ||
| 350 | _a0 | ||
| 490 |
_aProperty Week _v49(8) 24 November 1994, 9(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIn three decisions in the CA, "Middleton Potts & Co v Scottish Amicable Life Assurance Society", "National Westminster Bank v Co-Operative Wholesale Society" and ""Greenham Trading v Prudential Nominess", judges ruled that rent-free periods should be taken into account when setting a rent at review. However in a fouth case "Lehman Brothers v Broadgate Square" it was held that a rent-free period should not be taken into account. | ||
| 650 | _aRENT REVIEWS | ||
| 650 | _aRENT-FREE PERIODS | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT REVIEWS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 948 | _c04/03/1997 | ||
| 999 |
_c6564 _d6564 |
||