| 000 | 01233cam a2200205 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63259 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110074 | ||
| 100 | _aParisotti, M | ||
| 245 | _aEvil - or misunderstood? | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v265(8164) 1 December 2000, 62(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the net contribution clause and the common misconceptions concerning the detail of the principle and the fact that its complexity disguises its intention. Net contribution clauses effectively reduce a party's share of liability to reflect their share of fault. Without such a clause the warrantor may well have to stand alone, unable to divide the damages payable with others who were also at fault. On design-and-build jobs, the division of risk between contractor and consultant can be particularly contentious and needs a commonsense approach. Net contribution clauses work much more in the client's favour because they do not make the warranty conditional on similar warranties from the third parties. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aNET CONTRIBUTION CLAUSES | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aWARRANTIES | ||
| 690 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65653 _d65653 |
||