| 000 | 01298cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63298 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110079 | ||
| 100 | _aRawstron, A | ||
| 245 | _aArbitrators who are not fit and proper persons | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6694) 30 November 2000, 31(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe range of circumstances under which an arbitrator can be removed from proceedings is wider than generally acknowledged. The courts have the power, under the Arbitration Act 1996 s24(1), to remove an arbitrator who has conducted himself or the abitration proceedings badly; it is essential that arbitrators allow the parties to be heard. The test for removal is objective and the appellant need not have suffered prejudice. The case Miller Construction Ltd v James Moore (Earthmoving) is used as an example where the arbitrator was dismissed for misconduct. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATORS | ||
| 650 | _aDISMISSAL | ||
| 650 | _aMILLER CONSTRUCTION LTD V JAMES MOORE (EARTHMOVING) | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65655 _d65655 |
||