| 000 | 01268cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63295 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110282 | ||
| 100 | _aButton, R | ||
| 245 | _aEuropean Convention threatens change for adjudication | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSM (Chartered Surveyor Monthly) _vJanuary 2001, 33(1) |
||
| 520 | _aDiscusses the implication of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the adjudication process. The article warns that until there is a definitive ruling from the courts as to whether or not adjudication is subject to the Human Rights Act, adjudicators need to proceed carefully. The article looks at past cases that reflect on the situation and the attitudes of the courts towards adjudication. The article ends with a caveat for adjudicators to avoid any behaviour that could be deemed unfair and the need to end the uncertainty soon in order to keep adjudication a credible process. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 | ||
| 650 | _aPROCEDURAL UNFAIRNESS | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 700 | _aMills, R | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65764 _d65764 |
||