| 000 | 01092cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63328 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110283 | ||
| 100 | _aHaniff, M | ||
| 245 | _aLandlords on guard after rights of way ruling | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aCSM (Chartered Surveyor Monthly) _vJanuary 2001 |
||
| 520 | _aLooks at the case of "B&Q plc v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties Ltd" and the implications of the case for a landlord's right to alter rights granted in a lease. B&Q were successful in preventing the landlord from reducing the size of a turning circle as part of its access. The outcome of the case hinged on whether there was 'substantial interference' and the article considers how this affected the case and looks at an argument of 'ample right' as a more proper test in such as case as this. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRIGHT OF ACCESS | ||
| 650 | _aINTERFERENCE | ||
| 650 | _aB&Q PLC V LIVERPOOL & LANCASHIRE PROPERTIES LTD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES-CASE LAW | ||
| 700 | _aLangstaff, D | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65765 _d65765 |
||