000			01639cam a2200253 4500
001			ABS63414
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u110488
245			_aTelegraph Service Stations Ltd v Trafford BC and Another
260			_c2000
490			_aRating and Valuation Reporter _v[2000] RVR 356-364(9)
520			_aLT 24 May 2000. The claimants T sought compensation of £2,937,000 for the freehold interest in a petrol filling station with ancillary facilities. Trafford BC (Y) valued the premises at £1,035,572. The agreed valuation date 3 July 1995 and disturbance compensation was agreed at £20,000. Both parties agreed that the comparison method should be used and that the key factor of such a valuation was the adjusted level of throughput or core volume. The points at issue were: the use of comparables; the trading years for determining throughput; if any reduction should be made for potential competition from a planned rival; the percentage reduction to be taken to reflect T's pricing policy; whether the valuation should be determined by the capital or rental value per gallon; and if the redevelopment of the service station was commercially viable. "Held": the compensation payable was £1,753,375, based on the capital value method.
590			_aABS
650			_aCOMPARABLES
650			_aCOMPENSATION
650			_aJELSON LTD V BLABY DC
650			_aPETROL FILLING STATIONS
650			_aSERVICE STATIONS
650			_aTELEGRAPH SERVICE STATIONS LTD V TRAFFORD BC
650			_aTHROUGHPUT
650			_aValuation _96273
690			_aVALUATION-CASE LAW
942			_n0
999			_c65870 _d65870