000			01934cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS63422
008			000000n2000 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u110516
245			_aHenry Boot Construction (UK) Ltd v Malmaison Hotel (Manchester) Ltd
260			_c2000
490			_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2000] 3 WLR 1824-1841(18)
520			_aCA 28 July 2000. A dispute between H and M had been referred to an arbitrator, who made an interim award to M. H's appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 s69(1) was rejected by the HC., which also refused permission to appeal under the Arbitration Act 1996 s69(8). H then applied to the CA for leave to appeal against the judge's decision to dismiss their appeal against the arbitrator's interim award or the judges refusal to grant permission. This was on the grounds that the judge had failed to address fully the true interpretation of the JCT Standard Form of Building Contract 1980 with Quantities and had wrongly held that matters raised in H's statement of defence and counterclaim were within the scope of the reference to arbitration. The application was refused on the grounds that the under Arbitration Act 1996 s69(8) the CA had no jurisdiction to grant permission or review a refusal by the HC or CC, and that the Access to Justice Act 1999 s55 did not impliedly repeal this. "Held": application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
590			_aABS
650			_aACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 1999 S55
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S69(1)
650			_aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S69(8)
650			_aJCT 1980 WITH QUANTITIES
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aNATIONAL WESTMINSTER BANK PLC V ARTHUR YOUNG MCCLELLAND MOORES
690			_aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION
942			_n0
999			_c65875 _d65875