| 000 | 01484cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63381 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110678 | ||
| 100 | _aAtkinson, D. | ||
| 245 | _aGood reasons why possession is never nine-tenths of the law | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction News _v(6699) 18 January 2001, 14(1) |
||
| 520 | _aIllustrates the legal and contractual difficulties facing contractors attempting to take possession of a site. Observes that the employer must allow the contractor sufficient possession to allow the contract to be fulfilled and that, provided an attempt is made to gain access, the main contractor is not in breach of contract with subcontractors if access is denied. At the end of the contract the contractor will normally have a license to enter the site to fulfil its remaining obligations until the end of the defects liability period. Alternatively if the contract is terminated, and possession is denied, the employer's actions may be deemed to be in breach of contract. Finally contractors are reminded of their liability to third parties during their occupation of the site and the execution of the works. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aACCESS TO SITE | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTORS | ||
| 650 | _aDEFECTS LIABILITY PERIOD | ||
| 650 | _aEMPLOYERS | ||
| 650 | _aLIABILITY | ||
| 650 | _aPOSSESSION OF SITE | ||
| 650 | _aSUBCONTRACTORS | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65954 _d65954 |
||