000			01700cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS63416
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u110689
100			_aHarris, P.
245			_aWhy we've legalised theft
260			_c2001
490			_aBuilding _v266(8165) 19 January 2001, 60-61(2)
520			_aCalls for reform of the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s108(3) and of the Scheme for Construction Contracts Paragraph 23(2), which prevents the court or an arbitrator from reviewing an adjudicator's decision on an interim basis. This effectively means that an adjudicator's decision is irreversible. Consequently an unfair enrichment of one of the parties by that decision cannot be challenged unless: summary judgment is withheld; a cross-application for an accelerated trial is allowed alongside summary judgement; or summary judgment is not enforced before an accelerated trial or adjudication. Alternatively a judge could grant summary judgment but grant an application to have the award made by the adjudicator repaid to the defendant.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS
650			_aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108(3)
650			_aSCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS PARA 23(2)
650			_aSUMMARY JUDGMENTS
650			_aUNJUST ENRICHMENT
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c65963 _d65963