| 000 | 01907cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63478 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110722 | ||
| 245 | _aIn Davies and others' application | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 03 EG 134-139(6) |
||
| 520 | _aLT 5 October 2000. Two of the applicants, Mr and Mrs Davies, acquired a detached house and redundant agricultural buildings (the stables) from the SoS Wales acting on behalf of the Forestry Commission. Having obtained planning permission to convert the stables the Davies applied to have a restrictive covenant, requiring them to obtain permission from the vendor before altering any of the existing buildings or erecting new structures, discharged or reworded. The Davies, together with a third applicant Mr Murphy, contended that the covenant was either obsolete under Law of Property Act 1925 s84(1)(a) or that the proposed discharge or modification would not injure the persons entitled to the benefit under s84(1)(c). The first ground was rejected as it provided the Forestry Commission (the objector) with a means of control over development on the land but it was ruled that the covenant should be reworded under the second to allow the work for which planning permission had been given to take place. Compensation of £2,450 was to be paid to the objector under ground (c)(ii) by the applicants, who were also to pay half of the objector's costs. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL BUILDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPENSATION | ||
| 650 | _aCONVERSIONS | ||
| 650 | _aDAVIES APPLICATION | ||
| 650 | _aDISCHARGE | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S84(1)(A) | ||
| 650 | _aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S84(1)(C) | ||
| 650 | _aMODIFICATION | ||
| 650 | _aPLANNING PERMISSION | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c65990 _d65990 |
||