| 000 | 01966cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63423 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110762 | ||
| 245 | _aHerschel Engineering Ltd v Breen Property Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v[2000] 16 Const.L.J. 5, 366-372(7) |
||
| 520 | _aTCC 14 April 2000. B engaged H to carry out works to a property but refused to pay two of the claimant's invoices. H then started court proceedings and appealed against the subsequent decision to set aside the judgement in default. Before the appeal could be heard, however, H referred the dispute to adjudication. The adjudicator's award was in favour of the claimant but when H applied for summary judgment to enforce the award B argued that the court should not allow two concurrent proceedings for the same cause of action and that H had waived the right to adjudication by starting court proceedings. These arguments were dismissed as the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 s108 permits reference to adjudication at any time, as the Act anticipated adjudication taking place alongside litigation, and as these are not mutually exclusive routes to dispute resolution. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATION AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aCONCURRENT PROCEEDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aHERSCHEL ENGINEERING LTD V BREEN PROPERTY LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 S108 | ||
| 690 | _aMANGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66024 _d66024 |
||