| 000 | 01491cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63523 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2000 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u110901 | ||
| 245 | _aHescorp Italia spa v Morrison Construction Ltd and Impregilo UK Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2000 | ||
| 490 |
_aConstruction Law Journal _v[2000] 16 Const.L.J. 6, 413-424(11) |
||
| 520 | _aTCC 17 March 2000. Claimant applied for a summary judgement under CPR Part 24 together with an interim payment under CPR Part 25.7. The claimant and defendant were negotiating the conditions and obligations of the proposed steelwork sub-contract. During this period, the claimant started work and reached completion of the work, although there was still no signed contract. Claimant maintained they were entitled to be paid on a "quantum meruit" as there was still no formal contract. Defendant alleged that a contract was entered into, in an informal manner during correspondence, and that it was entitled to set off a counterclaim for breaches of contract, including liquidated damages for delay. "Held" applications adjourned. See ABS62131 | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPLETION DATES | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aQUANTUM MERUIT | ||
| 650 | _aINTERIM PAYMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aSUMMARY JUDGMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aHESCORP ITALIA SPA V MORRISON CONSTRUCTION LTD AND IMPREGILO UK LTD | ||
| 690 | _aBUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66102 _d66102 |
||