| 000 | 01378cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63601 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111101 | ||
| 245 | _aAmec Developments Ltd v Jury's Hotel Management (UK) Ltd | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette Law Reports _v[2001] 07 EG 163-171(9) |
||
| 520 | _aChD 17 November 2000. Claimant A had the benefit of a restrictive covenant against the construction of any building nearer to its property than a line between A and B specified on a plan. In breach of the covenant the defendant J built a hotel 3.9 metres beyond the A-B line. In 1998 A started proceedings for an injunction and damages.The parties agreed that the claim was for damages in lieu of an injunction under Lord Cairns Act (Chancery Amendment Act 1858), and the appropriate measure of damages was a sum of money as might reasonably have been demanded as a quid pro quo for permitting the encrouchment. Damages of £375,000 awarded. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aRESTRICTIVE COVENANTS | ||
| 650 | _aASSESSMENT OF DAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aCHANCERY AMENDMENT ACT 1858 | ||
| 650 | _aBUILDING LINE | ||
| 650 | _aDAMAGES | ||
| 650 | _aENCROACHMENT | ||
| 650 | _aBREACH OF COVENANT | ||
| 650 | _aAMEC DEVELOPMENTS LTD V JURY'S HOTEL MANAGEMENT (UK) LTD | ||
| 690 | _aPROPERTY AND LAND LAW-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66190 _d66190 |
||