| 000 | 01049cam a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63605 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111114 | ||
| 100 | _aLingayah, S. | ||
| 245 | _aAre evaluators asking the right questions? | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aRegeneration and Renewal _v9 February 2001, 16-17(2) |
||
| 520 | _aReports that the assessment of a regeneration scheme should be a positive process which can underscore the effectiveness of a project and contribute to renewal objectives. Warns against evaluators wrongly evaluating a project, which can lead to misdirection of funds, and lost impact of the initiative. Looks at the two traditional approaches to evaluation: quantitative and qualitative, and also discusses new directions the evaluation process may take. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aREGENERATION PROJECTS | ||
| 650 | _aEVALUATION | ||
| 650 | _aIMPACT ASSESSMENTS | ||
| 650 | _aCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT | ||
| 650 | _aURBAN REGENERATION | ||
| 690 | _aREGENERATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66202 _d66202 |
||