| 000 | 01457cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63558 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111115 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aEek a mouse! | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8168) 9 February 2001, 57(1) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the recent case "ABB Zantingh Ltd v Zedal Building Services". Mirror Group Newspapers contracted ABB to design, build and maintain two electricity generating stations at its printing works. ABB fell into dispute with its subcontractor Zedal, and when the dispute came to adjudication tried to argue that their engineering processing work fell outside of the remit of the Construction Act 1996. It was ruled that because the primary purpose of the site was printing and not power generation, the Construction Act 1998 applied and the adjudicator had jurisdiction. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aA B B ZANTINGH LTD V ZEDAL BUILDING SERVICES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHOUSING GRANTS, CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996 | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aPROCESS ENGINEERING | ||
| 650 | _aJURISDICTION | ||
| 650 | _aPOWER GENERATION | ||
| 650 | _aPRINTING WORKS | ||
| 650 | _aELECTRICITY GENERATORS | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66203 _d66203 |
||