| 000 | 01021cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63585 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111180 | ||
| 100 | _aBingham, T. | ||
| 245 | _aAs clear as mud | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aBuilding _v266(8169) 16 February 2001, 69(1) |
||
| 520 | _aBriefly outlines the "Flannery v Halifax Estate Agents" case notable because the judge did not fully explain his reasoning behind the judgment resulting in the CA sending the case to be retried with a new judge. Stresses the importance of fully explaining judgments for construction adjudication. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aFLANNERY V HALIFAX ESTATE AGENTS | ||
| 650 | _aREASONS FOR JUDGMENT | ||
| 650 | _aCONSTRUCTION ADJUDICATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS | ||
| 650 | _aTRANSPARENCY | ||
| 650 | _aNEGLIGENCE | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66233 _d66233 |
||