000			01222cam a2200253 4500
001			WB3709-20
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111209
245			_aCourt judgment undermines time limit on claims
260			_c2001
490			_aFinancial Times _v23 February 2001, 5(1)
520			_aThe CA ruling in "Cave v Robinson Jarvis & Walsh" that a negligence claim that had been brought more than three years after the problem concerned came to light could go ahead means that professionals can no longer rely on the fifteen year longstop. Previously it was only possible to bring a later claim where facts relating to it had been deliberately concealed or there had been a 'deliberate commission of a breach of duty' by the professional involved but in the judgment this was interpreted as any deliberate act resulting in a breach of a duty of care.
590			_aWB
650			_aCAVE V ROBINSON JARVIS & ROLF
650			_aDUTY OF CARE
650			_aLATENT DAMAGES ACT 1986
650			_aLIMITATION
650			_aLONGSTOP DATE
650			_aNEGLIGENCE
650			_aNEGLIGENCE CLAIMS
650			_aTIME BAR
690			_aPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE-NEGLIGENCE
942			_n0
999			_c66255 _d66255