000			01427cam a2200241 4500
001			ABS63563
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111210
100			_aKlein, R.
245			_aWhere limits of control lie in arbitration
260			_c2001
490			_aConstruction News _v(6704) February 2001, 14(1)
520			_aConstruction contract disputes often involve a number of parties. Examines how subcontractors' rights in arbitration cases can be limited in multiparty disputes, because each of the contracts involving one of the parties, may not contain an arbitration clause. Illustrates difficulties that can arise in "Lafarge Redland Aggregates v Shepherd Hill Civil Engineering" in which it was eventually decided that the subcontractor could participate in a main contract arbitration with the consent of the employer and arbitrator. If there was no consensual agreement, the subcontractor could pursue the dispute under a separate arbitration.
590			_aABS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aCONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
650			_aENGINEERING CONTRACTS
650			_aLAFARGE REDLAND AGGREGATES LTD V SHEPHARD HILL CIVIL ENGINEERING LTD
650			_aSUBCONTRACTS
650			_aICE CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT (FIFTH EDITION)
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c66256 _d66256