000			01510cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS63594
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111222
100			_aLangley, R.
245		2	_aA case in point...
260			_c2001
490			_aCost Engineer _v39(1) February 2001, 13(1)
520			_aInterprets two recent cases which hold importance for project practitioners: "Inntrepreneur Pub Co v East Crown Ltd" (2000) and "Panatown Ltd v Alfred McAlpine" (2000). The first case involved E taking a lease of a public house from I. The lease contained a clause that constituted the entire agreement between the parties. The outcome being that an 'entire agreement' clause invalidates a warranty. The second case illustrates the problem project managers face attempting to decide which company should be named upon the Contract Form as the Employer under the contract. One point raised in the outcome of the case is that Third Party Warranties are useful.
590			_aABS
650			_aINNTREPRENEUR PUB CO V EAST CROWN LTD
650			_aPANATOWN LTD V ALFRED MCALPINE
650			_aLINDEN GARDENS TRUST LTD V LENESTA SLUDGE DISPOSALS LTD
650			_aDARLINGTON BC V WILTSHIER NORTHERN LTD
650			_aENTIRE AGREEMENT CLAUSE
650			_aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS-CONSTRUCTION COLLATERAL WARRANTY FORMS
650			_aPROJECT MANAGERS
650			_aUTS V MILBURN
650			_aCASE LAW
690			_aProject management _96261
942			_n0
999			_c66267 _d66267