000 01139cam a2200241 4500
001 ABS63530
008 000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035 _a(Sirsi) u111230
100 _aWallace, I.
245 _aStill no answer: third party damage and the legal black hole
260 _c2001
490 _aConstruction Law Reports
_v18(1) January 2001, 113-121(9)
520 _aArgues that the decision of the HL in "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd" (2000) does not help resolve the significant issues of contract and third party damage raised by that case. Considers the central issue of the Alfred McAlpine case, which was the proper measure of damage where a party in breach of a contract fails to supply promised goods and services to the recipient who's willing to pay for them.
590 _aABS
650 _aALFRED MCALPINE CONSTRUCTION LTD V PANATOWN LTD
650 _aTHIRD PARTY
650 _aBREACH OF CONTRACT
650 _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
650 _aMEASURE OF DAMAGES
650 _aCASE LAW
690 _aBUILT ENVIRONMENT-BUILDING CONTRACT FORMS
942 _n0
999 _c66274
_d66274