| 000 | 01402cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | WB3710-34 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111304 | ||
| 245 | _aRebus sic stantibus rule considered | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] EGCS 26 (1) (02/03/01) |
||
| 520 | _a"Williams (VO) v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd and another" CA 15 February 2001. Two ratepayers (B) occupied licensed premises in different parts of a shopping centre in Milton Keynes. Surrounding retail units commanded much higher rents. In November 1993 Buckinghamshire VT fixed rateable values of £132,000 and £210,000 for B. B appealed to the LT and these values were significantly reduced. The VO appealed to CA, contending that the more lucrative potential of the premises as shops should be taken into account. The Tribunal decision was upheld, and the appeal dismissed. The "Rebus sic stantibus" rule, expressed by the provisions of Local Government Finance Act 1988 s6, had been properly interpreted. | ||
| 590 | _aWB | ||
| 650 | _aWILLIAMS (VO) V SCOTTISH AND NEWCASTLE RETAIL LTD AND ANOTHER | ||
| 650 | _aREBUS SIC STANTIBUS | ||
| 650 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT AND FINANCE ACT 1988 S6 | ||
| 650 | _aRENTS | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aRATEABLE VALUES | ||
| 650 | _aLANDS TRIBUNAL | ||
| 690 | _aRATING AND LOCAL TAXATION | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66324 _d66324 |
||