000			01505cab a2200193 4500
001			ABS38428
008			090401t1987 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
035			_a(Sirsi) u10502
041			_aeng
245			_aNurit Bar v Pathwood Investments Ltd
260			_c1987
350			_a0
490			_aProperty and Compensation Reports _v(1987) 54 PCR 178-186(8)
520			_aCA 27 February 1987 Appeal against a cc decision upholding the decision of the registrar on an application by the landlords of premises in Hampstead, that the court had no jurisdiction to allow an amendment to an application for a new tenancy under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 when the time-limit for making the application under s 29(3) 1954 Act had expired. The tenant occupied the ground floor and first floor of the premises and the original application for a new tenancy only referred to the ground floor. The tenant sought an amendment to the original application to include the first floor. CA held that the court did have the jurisdiction to allow amendments to the application after the expiry of the time-limit. The court would exercise its discretion to allow the amendment as the tenant would suffer substantial detriment if the flat on the first floor which was her home was not protected by the 1954 Act, while the landlord was not being deprived of any vested right, since it wa
650			_aBUSINESS TENANCIES
690			_aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW-BUSINESS TENANCIES
942			_n0
948			_c04/03/1997
999			_c6633 _d6633