| 000 | 01391cam a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63731 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111357 | ||
| 100 | _aStevens, D. | ||
| 245 | _aWithdrawal symptoms | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v(0109) 3 March 2001, 224(1) |
||
| 520 | _aThe Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II provides business tenants with some measure of security of tenure. Thus landlords are often keen to avoid granting a lease within this Act. Looks at ways in which security of tenure can be avoided. These include arranging for the lease to be contracted out of the relevant 1954 Act provisions. Notes that contracting-out orders are generally made by the county court that covers the area where the tenant lives, or in which the property is situated. Warns that care should be taken when considering variations to the contracted-out lease after it has been granted. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT ACT 1954 PART II | ||
| 650 | _aSECURITY OF TENURE | ||
| 650 | _aBUSINESS LEASES | ||
| 650 | _aCONTRACTING OUT | ||
| 650 | _aST GILES HOTEL LTD V MICROWORLD TECHNOLOGY LTD | ||
| 650 | _aRECEIVER FOR THE METROPOLITAN POLICE DISTRICT V PALACEGATE PROPERTIES LTD | ||
| 650 | _aFRIENDS PROVIDENT LIFE OFFICE V BRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASES | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66343 _d66343 |
||