| 000 | 01176cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63727 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111417 | ||
| 245 | _aGreenbank v Pickles | ||
| 260 | _v2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aEstates Gazette _v[2001] 09 EG 230-236(7) |
||
| 520 | _aCA 20 October 2000. A held an agricultural tenancy, granted by the respondent (B) in 1980 for a 10 year term. In earlier proceedings it was held the parties had been partners. By a CC order in July 1993, the partnership was declared dissolved. The tenancy was assigned to B who was ordered to make a 10% payment of its value to A. The CC Judge determined the value of the tenancy. A appealed on the grounds that the valuer's evidence was illogical. Appeal allowed. The judge ruled that the same principles as those accepted in Walton's Executors v Inland Revenue Commissioners applied. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS | ||
| 650 | _aGREENBANK V PICKLES | ||
| 650 |
_aValuation _96273 |
||
| 650 | _aWALTONS EXECUTORS V INLAND REVENUE COMMISSIONERS | ||
| 650 | _aAGRICULTURAL TENANCY | ||
| 690 | _aLANDLORD AND TENANT-CASE LAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66384 _d66384 |
||