| 000 | 01238cam a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63742 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111455 | ||
| 245 | _aWandsworth LBC v Railtrack plc | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aWeekly Law Reports _v[2001] 1 WLR, 23 February 2001, 368-386(19) |
||
| 520 | _aQBD 31 July 2000. Inconvenience was caused to pedestrians by pigeons, roosting under a railway bridge, who fouled the pavement below. The highway authority (B) incurred escalating costs through cleaning the pavement. B had permission to pigeon-proof the bridge but claimed the responsibility lay with A. In court proposed B was liable to them in public and/or private nuisance, and claimed reimbursement for cleaning costs. "Held", allowing the claim, that the pigeon infestation represented a public nuisance. Ruled there was no difference between nuisances involving physical damage and those interfering with comfort and inconvenience. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aWANDSWORTH LBC V RAILTRACK PLC | ||
| 650 | _aNUISANCE | ||
| 650 | _aPUBLIC NUISANCE | ||
| 650 | _aPRIVATE NUISANCE | ||
| 650 | _aPIGEONS | ||
| 650 | _aBRIDGES | ||
| 650 | _aABATEMENT | ||
| 690 | _aLAW | ||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66411 _d66411 |
||