000			01603cam a2200265 4500
001			WB3712-27
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111512
245			_aTown and country planning
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette Case Summaries _v[2001] EGCS 32(1) (17/03/01)
520			_a"R v Lichfield DC and another ex p Lichfield Securities Ltd" CA 8 March 2001. The applicant, LS, obtained planning permission from LDC in 1996 to develop a part of Lichfield airfield knowing that the respondent W had also applied for permission to erect a food-processing unit and ancillary works on part of the same land. LDC granted planning permission for development of the food-processing unit and entered into a s106 agreement with LSS. W sought judicial review contending LDC had unfairly entered into the 106 agreement without allowing them make representations. The judge found that W could make further representation to LDC but refused relief on the grounds that the applicant's challenge to LDC's decision had not been made fast enough within the provisions of Ord 531 4(1).
590			_aWB
600			_aR V LICHFIELD DC EX PARTE LICHFIELD SECURITIES LTD
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650			_aTOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 S106
650			_aPLANNING PERMISSION
650			_aNEW DEVELOPMENT
650			_aROAD LINKS
650			_aTRANSPORT
650			_aPLANNING APPLICATIONS
650			_aR V LICHFIELD DC AND ANOTHER EX P LICHFIELD SECURITIES LTD
690			_aPlanning and development _96259
942			_n0
999			_c66452 _d66452