| 000 | 01302cam a2200217 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63680 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111513 | ||
| 100 | _aJones, D. | ||
| 245 | _aExpert determination and arbitration | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration _v67(1) February 2001, 17-29(13) |
||
| 520 | _aExamines the use of expert determination as an alternative form of dispute resolution to arbitration. Looks at the manner and extent of its use. Compares expert determination and arbitration, and presents reasons why each is used. Includes a useful summary of procedural/substantive differences. Concludes that it is impossible to find a practical reason for choosing expert determination over arbitration. Despite its illusory advantages of speed, reduced cost and informal procedure, warns that in choosing expert determination parties are forsaking an internationally enforceable award, and an established system of domestic and international laws. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aEXPERT DETERMINATION | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION | ||
| 650 | _aCOMPARISON | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66453 _d66453 |
||