000			01213cam a2200265 4500
001			ABS63763
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111538
100			_aTurley, J.
245		2	_aA vicarious revolution
260			_c2001
490			_aEstates Gazette _v(0111) 17 March 2001, 169(1)
520			_aIn "Crane v Coal Authority" CA ruled that the Law of Property Act 1925 s79 has a wider implication than was previously thought. Describes the circumstances of the case. Traditionally, s79 was viewed as not making the burden of covenant run with the land. However, this ruling indicates that in giving a covenant in relation to his own land, an original contracting party is liable not only for its own breach of that covenant, but also for those of successors in title (e.g subsequent owners of the freehold). Also highlights other issues raised by the case.
590			_aABS
650			_aLAW OF PROPERTY ACT 1925 S79
650			_aCOVENANTS
650			_aLAND OWNERSHIP
650			_aBREACH OF COVENANT
650			_aSUCCESSORS IN TITLE
650			_aLIABILITY
650			_aLEASES
650			_aCRANE V COAL AUTHORITY
690			_aPROPERTY
942			_n0
999			_c66473 _d66473