000			01655cam a2200277 4500
001			ABS63753
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111767
100			_aEvans, D.
245			_aHuman Rights and Waste Planning
260			_c2001
490			_aWastes Management _vMarch 2001, 10-11(2)
520			_aLooks at the potentially far-reaching implications of the HL's decision, expected in April 2001, on a case involving RAF Alconbury and three other developments (see: ABS63468). The HL is expected to uphold the High Court's earlier ruling that the decision-making role of the SoS, in planning and related areas, is incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998. Focuses particularly on the implications for waste planning, if the decision is upheld. Also notes that it will mean the drafting of new primary legislation and regulations. Suggests that one of the most significant changes could be the granting of the right to appeal against planning decisions by objectors. This could entail huge costs.
590			_aABS
650			_aHUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
650			_aCONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS ART 6
650			_aWASTE PLANNING
650			_aPLANNING LAW
650			_aIMPLICATIONS
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS EX P ALCONBURY DEVELOPMENTS
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P HOLDING AND BARNES PLC
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P LEGAL AND GENERAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY
650			_aR V SOS ENVIRONMENT EX P PREMIER LEISURE
690			_aENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND CONSULTANCY-PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
942			_n0
999			_c66593 _d66593