000			01544cam a2200229 4500
001			ABS63685
008			000000n2001 000 0 eng u
035			_a(Sirsi) u111936
245			_aArbitration and the Brussels Convention: antisuit injunctions
260			_c2001
490			_aArbitration Law Monthly _v1(2) March 2001, 3-7(5)
520			_aWhere an arbitration clause has cited England as the seat of an arbitration, the English courts will issue an injunction to prevent parties starting judicial proceedings in another jurisdiction. Looks at the question of whether judicial discretion should be exercised in favour of the grant of an injunction, especially where the person to be injuncted resides in the EC. In this situation, jurisdiction depends on the Brussels Convention 1968. Under article 2 of the Convention, a defendant can only be sued in the contracting state where he resides. Looks at the recent case "Navigation Maritime Bulgare v Rustal Trading Ltd", heard in the English courts, which involved an application for an antisuit injunction, and throws some light on the impact on English arbitration proceedings of the Brussels Convention.
590			_aABS
650			_aBRUSSELS CONVENTION 1968
650			_aINJUNCTIONS
650			_aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
650			_aJURISDICTION
650			_aEUROPE
650			_aNAVIGATION MARITIME BULGARE V RUSTAL TRADING LTD
690			_aDispute resolution _96236
942			_n0
999			_c66703 _d66703