| 000 | 01479cam a2200277 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | ABS63687 | ||
| 008 | 000000n2001 000 0 eng u | ||
| 035 | _a(Sirsi) u111940 | ||
| 245 | _aEnforcement of foreign arbitration awards | ||
| 260 | _c2001 | ||
| 490 |
_aArbitration Law Monthly _v1(2) March 2001, 10-12(3) |
||
| 520 | _aProvided particular documentary evidence is supplied, the New York Convention 1958 provides that a foreign arbitration award can be enforced. Details of the evidence required are set out in article IV of the Convention, and are reproduced in the English Arbitration Act 1996 s102. They have also been set out in the Hong Kong Ordinance s43. Discusses "Medison Co Ltd v Victor (Far East) Ltd", which dealt with the enforcement of a South Korean arbitration award in Hong Kong. The decision includes important observations on the role of the enforcing court, and thus has implications for other countries. | ||
| 590 | _aABS | ||
| 650 | _aMANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION | ||
| 650 | _aNEW YORK CONVENTION 1958 | ||
| 650 | _aARBITRATION ACT 1996 S102 | ||
| 650 | _aMEDISON CO LTD V VICTOR (FAR EAST) LTD | ||
| 650 | _aHONG KONG ARBITRATION ORDNANCE | ||
| 650 | _aINTERNATIONAL | ||
| 650 | _aFOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARDS | ||
| 650 | _aENFORCEMENT | ||
| 650 | _aHEARSAY EVIDENCE | ||
| 650 | _aFULL DISCLOSURE | ||
| 690 |
_aDispute resolution _96236 |
||
| 942 | _n0 | ||
| 999 |
_c66705 _d66705 |
||